Divorced Dad MinutePodcasts
One Minute Podcast Tips

DADCAST Divorced Dads Rights 60 Minute Podcasts Quick Links Support Group
Meeting Info
Toronto Mtg
Hamilton Mtg
Blogroll - links open in new page 
The Parenting Diary The #1 tool that helps organize all the details to create a parenting plan for Mediation or Family Court. Click for info Links |
| | Another example of Dad being a second class citizen in Canada Location: Blogs Divorced Dad Daily |
 | | Posted by: Danny Guspie | 9/23/2007 | “I think men are equally involved with their children and should be presumed in law to be equally involved as their partners. When you sign on the dotted line for your marriage licence, does anyone tell the man, ‘you know what, you're not an equal partner?'”The form is offensive and goes against the Charter of Rights, said Mr. Guspie. “I would encourage any man that finds himself in that situation to simply phone up his local tax office and say ‘how would you like to face me in federal court next week?'”
Editor's note: At least I got the definitive word in this article...there may be hope for society yet. Notably NDP MP Olivia Chow seems to agrees with me... For child-care benefit, mom's the word GLORIA GALLOWAY Globe and Mail Update Ottawa — Dads who try to complete the forms required to claim the federal government's new child care benefit may be surprised to learn they need a note from their wives. To qualify for the $100-a-month Universal Child Care Benefit payments, parents are asked to fill in the application for the Canada Child Tax Benefit. But the government stipulates that mothers, not fathers, must do the applying. The third paragraph of the form states: “When both a male and a female parent live in the same home as the child, we presume that the female parent is primarily responsible and should apply, unless a note from the female parent is attached to this application that states that the male parent is primarily responsible for the child.” The form is not new. It is the same document that parents fill in to apply for the Canada Child Tax Benefit and has been in use for several years. But, because the new child-care benefit is universal, more moms and dads are seeing it. And some are concerned about the message it imparts. “We're living in the 21st Century. There is no reason for this whatsoever,” said Danny Guspie, the executive director of Fathers' Resources International, a Toronto-based group that lobbies for fathers' rights. “I think men are equally involved with their children and should be presumed in law to be equally involved as their partners. When you sign on the dotted line for your marriage licence, does anyone tell the man, ‘you know what, you're not an equal partner?'” The form is offensive and goes against the Charter of Rights, said Mr. Guspie. “I would encourage any man that finds himself in that situation to simply phone up his local tax office and say ‘how would you like to face me in federal court next week?'” Jacqueline Couture, a spokeswoman for Revenue Canada, said the forms comply with the Income Tax Act, which is an old law. The presumption that women are the primary caregivers goes back to 1945 and the introduction of the Family Allowance, which many Canadians remember as the baby bonus, she said. But Olivia Chow, the Human Resources critic for the NDP, said new forms mean fathers are being denied their responsibility to their child. “I couldn't believe this actually,” said Ms. Chow. “This is what, the ‘50s, or even before that?” The requirement that mothers must write a note giving their husbands permission to fill out the form is almost humorous, said Ms. Chow. “And the assumption that the female would always be the primary caregiver - I thought that a child is a shared responsibility, keeping a household is a shared responsibility,” she said. “With a form like that, no wonder we still find that females still do most of the household work and have tremendous stress because they never have any time if we expect her, even if she's working, to be the primary care giver.” | | | Permalink | Trackback |
Comments (8) Add Comment
| Re: Another example of Dad being a second class citizen in Canada | By Mohamood on 5/31/2006 | | Way to go Danny. Yet another example of the rights of dads being cast aside in this unfair system. There is hope yet though, beginning with small changes like on this one form. |
|
| Re: Another example of Dad being a second class citizen in Canada | By Beaten Dad on 6/5/2006 | Danny Guspie hit the nail right on the head. This tax law is as unfair and as archaic as the current family law. It’s another example of how fathers are treated as inferior parents. Governments should pull their heads out of the sand and stand up to the feminist movement that seems to dictate the laws of this country concerning families and children. There is an equally powerful force swelling in this country, composed of GOOD father’s who are sick and tired of being kicked in the teeth by the court system. Fathers with little or no contact with their children and absurdly unjust child support orders that they can’t begin to afford to pay. If the general public was aware of the injustices being carried out on a daily basis in this country, they would be ashamed to call themselves Canadians. It’s a real tragedy that the public has been force fed the concept of all divorced fathers being “dead beat dads” when in actuality, most are responsible, loving parents who have been raped by the current laws of this country and by the gutless bureaucrats who deliver them. When suicide is a too-commonly chosen alternative for these Dads, you have to wonder how the law makers in our society sleep at night. When will the nightmare end? Beaten Dad Kanata, Ontario |
|
| Re: Another example of Dad being a second class citizen in Canada | By George Biggar on 6/6/2006 | Danny: This is bittersweet and confusing for me, because I can't stand Olivia Chow... But I have to agree with her comments, even if for a different reason!
Keep fighting Danny... It took me 5 years, as you know, just to get recognition that I have a minority stake in my children's lives...
When will the same idiots that whine and complain about the high level of crime in the city and the lack of family values wake up and realize that they engineered the situation by completely tieing the hands of caring fathers who wish to have a positive impact on their children? How does anyone expect children to respect fathers if the legal system states we are virtually worthless? And how is it that the legal system and laws in general could reflect values so vastly different than society as a whole, without being gutted and rethought?
I have never seen a more obvious example of systemic bias than this one. Can you imagine if the tax form stated "In order to be eligible for a tax credit, wives must first produce a written statement from their husbands proving they are responsible for their children"?! There would be rioting in the streets!
|
|
| Re: Another example of Dad being a second class citizen in Canada | By JIM B. on 6/6/2006 | | RELEVANT TO THE SUBJECT BEING DISCUSSED : CH TELEVISION RECENTLY CARRIED A LIVE INTERVIEW REGARDING "PARENTAL ALIENATION SYNDROME ... A KIDNAPPED MIND ", A BOOK WRITTEN BY PAMELA RICHARDSON WHO APPARENTLY HAD LOST CUSTODY OF HER CHILD . IT SEEMED THAT IT WAS ONLY AFTER INTENSE QUESTIONING BY THE INTERVIEWER THAT MS. RICHARDSON FINALLY CONCEDED THAT WOMEN ALSO INDULGE IN BRAINWASHING CHILDREN IN ORDER TO ALIENATE THEM FROM THEIR FATHERS . MY GOODNESS GRACIOUS ME , HAD IT NOT BEEN FOR THE PERSISTENCE OF THE INTERVIEWER WHO SUCCEEDED IN BRINGING THIS FACT TO LIGHT , I WOULD HAVE BEEN LEFT WITH THE IMPRESSION THAT ONLY FATHERS WERE GUILTY OF PERPETRATING THE ALIENATION OF THEIR CHILDREN FROM THEIR MOTHERS BY KIDNAPPING THEIR MINDS . HANG IN THERE , DANNY . CANADIAN FATHERS NEED YOU . JIM B. |
|
| Re: Another example of Dad being a second class citizen in Canada | By Sam S. on 6/6/2006 | | Second Class citizen is right. I have CAS putting a child protection order on the family and they are not placing the kids with me, their dad, even though they have been to see me and my place, where the children sleep and told me that everything was totally appropriate. Had situations been reversed, you could be sure that CAS would be grabbing the kids away from me in a heartbeat. |
|
| Re: Another example of Dad being a second class citizen in Canada | By Eva McCormick on 6/6/2006 | Thankyou Danny Guspie for speaking your peace on behalf of all fathers. This is the 21 Century and fathers take an active roll in the lives of their children. The rights of fathers are very unjust within the law and government of this great country. Sharing the responsibilities is the mainstay of families these days. It is high time for the powers that be get with it and change the laws so our children can enjoy the love and affection of both parents. What more could a child ask for.
E. McCormick |
|
| Re: Another example of Dad being a second class citizen in Canada | By William on 6/6/2006 | This is very true and yet just one of the many things that father's can't do. Last year when I tried to get the birth records from the hospital that my son was born at I was denied because I was not the mother and the hospital stated that they don't even put the fathers information on record. That was one of the biggest kick in the pants that I had ever gotten.
I am in a custody battle for my now 4 year old son and yet it feels like being the father I am just tossed aside most of the time and it really ticks me off. |
|
| Letter to Globe & Mail | By Vijay on 6/6/2006 | Here is my letter tot the Globe and Mail in response to the article:
=========================================
Dear Sir,
Mr. Guspie only scratches the surface when he correctly points out that the Canada Revenue form breaks the Canadian Charter of Rights. I urge the Right Honourable Mrs. Olivia Chow, as well as all our duly elected representatives, to make children a shared responsibilty between both parents. The current Custody and Access legislation is in itself against the Charter of Rights, as well as against the rights of the Child. Hopefully, this parliament will finally correct the system that has been wrong for decades and which has no place in modern society.
Kind regards, Vijay Shah
|
|
Site Search |
|  Get the
Divorced Dad
Tool Box
Subscribe to our Divorced Dad Newsletter
Divorced Dad ToolBox Download Toolbox
Learn the winning strategies and tactics designed to help eliminate unnecessary legal fees in Family Court
Download if one of these apply to you: * MASSIVE Legal Bills* Losing in Family Court * Lawyer problems * Parenting time * Access Problems * Child Custody * Paternity Fraud * Grandparents rights * Child support too high * Can’t settle property * Ex-wife won’t work * Alimony Problems * Judges not listening
Fathers Rights Newsletter Subcribe to our regular e-mail updates
Just complete the contact form at the top of this page. INTERESTED IN FATHERS RIGHTS? TIRED OF LOSING IN FAMILY COURT? Winning = Peace for your kids HERE AND NOW - Not Tomorrow... Subscribe to our newsletter and learn how to: * Improve parenting time * Obtain Shared Parenting * Win child custody * Pay correct child support * End spousal support * Get rid of unfair arrears * Protect Yorrself * Get your rights enforced * Keep Drivers Licence * Be treated with respect * Maintain your dignity * Win in Family Court Learn the secret strategies and winning legal tactics of successful Divorced Dads who win in Family Court every time by applying OUR FORMULA for “WAGING PEACE” for the sake of your kids. STOP LOSING. BE A WINNER TODAY! Subscribe to our newsletter "FATHERS RIGHTS NOW" and LEARN HOW... Categories Archives
Search Blog
Divorced Dad Daily Latest Articles The ANSWER for Divorced Dads looking to WIN in Family Court | | There is no reason to be losing so badly when you are a divorced dad in Family Court... except that you don't have the right ideas, tools nor skills. BUT....IF… you can listen, follow a plan and are “coach-able”, we can DEFINITELY help you to improve the situation thi Sunday January 13th, 2008 on our teleseminar / webcast at DivorcedDadWeekly.com | | 1/11/2008 3:36:48 AM |
| Summary - “Divorce 101 - Step Four - Negotiation: Positioning For Peace” | | Waging Peace is the # 1 Negotiation / Positioning tool, strategy, tactic and systematic approach we recommend for creating multiple win/win solutions when you are a divorced dad in Family Court, facing custody, access, child visitation and child support issues. Waging Peace means putting aside blame, anger, recrimination, fault finding, revenge and all other negative emotions and fully considering the implications of every choice you make and how it will affect your child of divorce. | | 10/22/2007 2:49:08 PM |
| | | | | Divorced Dad Daily - The FRI Blog | Divorced Dad Daily (DDD) is the the main blog (parent) of FRI. It includes a category (child) entitled Fathers Resources. | | 9/24/2007 12:10:16 AM |
| History of Fathers Resources International - Part one | | History of Fathers Resources International, its activities and the autobiography of its founder, Danny Guspie. Part one - Prologue: The boy becomes the man: A childhood hero points the way and provides the inspiration. | | 9/24/2007 12:10:16 AM |
| Press Release Blog | | We will be keeping the media and the public up to date on Fathers Resources International by publishing press releases and media reports here on the Press & Media Blog. | | 9/24/2007 12:10:16 AM |
| | Joint custody could improve state's child support efforts | FOLLOW THE MONEY... Good article here on child support enforcement being improved by having a joint custody presumption in Michigan: Note the following - the industrialization of child support as an adjunct to "The Divorce Industry" One thousand seven hundred employees now work full-time in Friend of the Court offices as referees, counselors, clerks, and support staff in all 83 Michigan counties. In addition, many employees of the criminal justice system devote a major portion of their workday to this last vestige of debtor's prison. So it is no surprise that there was consternation in Lansing over a federal plan that cut nearly a quarter billion dollars in Michigan subsidies for child-support enforcement. But one state legislator, Rep. Leslie Mortimer, R-Horton, has introduced a bill that could reduce the need for devoting so many resources to child support enforcement. The problem we see daily is the "Ghost figures" that Ontario uses for its claim that there is 3 Billion dollars in unpaid child support. Hogwash - 2 Billion of it is nothing but the meter ticking on matters that never return to Court for a termination order because dad can't afford a lawyer to get his Court order changed. Then he faces licence suspensions and possible jail time. In the Alberta case Henry and Henry which is currently before the Canada's Supreme Court, a dissenting Judge nailed it perfectly - If child support should automatically go up with an increase of income, fairness dictates the reverse should also happen - Child support should go down when income decreases. But then what would everybody at Child Support Enforcement do for a real job? | | 9/24/2007 12:10:16 AM |
| | | History of Fathers Resources International - Part Two | History of Fathers Resources International - Part Two By Danny Guspie PROLOGUE: Part 2 - The Apple does not fall far from the tree “The Beatles: An Authorized Biography” by Hunter Davies spoke to me like no other book I’d ever read before. I was a well read kid at that point, having read everything I could get my hands on from the moment I could read which would be somewhere around age four when my mother taught me the alphabet with a set of plastic letters that had magnets and a board to move them around on… The Book: A wondrous tale happy, sad and true (or at least so I believed at that age…) that I related to. Mainly because of John Lennon’s family history, there was something very familiar and haunting about it, despite many things that were not held in common between our respective families. It was his quintessential Rock n’ Roll vocal – he seemed like the real deal (at a time when my family seemed like a charade…). I could not only hear his pain, but I could feel it – it gave expression to my own. So began a love affair of a different sort, one of a young boy who’d found a kindred spirit, who wanted to know why he’d been so deeply affected by this story. It was not to be the first or the last time John Lennon would profoundly shape my development and independence in the same way Elvis Presley did for Lennon at age 15… Arguably, Lennon’s music and the Beatles were the most influential aspect of my young life, helping me to feel hope, happiness and providing a language to articulate express and begin creating my own identity during my family crisis and resulting divorce. I always knew my parents were troubled from age 1 onwards. But at age 9 I became extremely cognizant that the end of my family was nigh. John gave me an outlet. A very healthy one. He taught me how to transform pain into art. Music has always been my greatest outlet to expression. But John taught me how to scream. Really scream in a Rock n’ Roll way - Once I heard his first solo album when I was 12. I began my own form of primal therapy. When I heard him sing “Mother” I finally felt I wasn’t the only one who felt the same pain over a family that had large problems. I absorbed Rock n’ Roll totally. It gave me a reason to get up everyday. Even today Little Richard’s “Wop bop a loo bop a wop bam boom…gets me “rockin’” I’m sure anyone who hears me play today, and who has heard my songs can easily see that John Lennon and Keith Richards made a huge and everlasting impression on me musically. So I began playing drums and songwriting, and emulating John. Within 12 months my parents separated and ultimately divorced and I became a latch key kid, living with dad first then Mom, then on my own. So began my lifelong journey with divorce - But before I left home, I became a full fledged drop out. Spare was my favorite class in High School (with “high” being the operative word….) At age 14 I was playing guitar, hooky on a daily basis, had done an enormous amount of drugs of all sorts and on weekends go to watch the film Rolling Stones “Gimme Shelter” - 35 times to be exact at CineCity. I was also fanatical film watcher at the “Original 99 cent Roxy Theatre” long before the Rocky Horror Picture Show destroyed and closed that theatre down for good. It was a good place to hang and get high with minimal fuss and forget the mess my life was because of my own unhappiness with my family. Next – Lost and Found | | 9/24/2007 12:10:16 AM |
| | | Child-support bill tied to revoked drivers' licenses fails in Utah | | A child-support bill tied to drivers' licenses fails to pass the Senate in Utah - Associated Press: Utah Senators had concerns about revoking the driving privileges of those not paying child support because they weren't being allowed to see their children. | | 9/24/2007 12:10:16 AM |
| MORE than 300,000 divorced dads will pay more relaistic child suport in Australia | | Caring for a child for between 52 and 126 nights each year will reduce the amount owed by 24 per cent, while those with custody for more than 176 nights will cut their maintenance bills by half. The new formula also recognises for the first time that the cost of raising children increases as they get older. | | 9/24/2007 12:10:16 AM |
| | "ISN'T CHILD SUPPORT FOR THE CHILD?" By Danny Guspie | | Open letter from Danny Guspie to the Governments of Canada: "ISN'T CHILD SUPPORT FOR THE CHILD?" I was inspired to ask yet again for an accounting of where the increased tax revenue dollars go since the implementation of the Child Support Guidelines in 1997.
Heidi and I met with the Department of Finance who could not give us these answers 9 years ago. Hopefully they've had time to do the books ;-) | | 9/24/2007 12:10:16 AM |
| | Love's grand - Divorce is a Hundred Grand ;-) | | Yes, say two University of Virginia sociologists who found that married women are happiest with a sensitive guy who earns most of the family's money. Women are also willing to take on more housework if they feel their husbands pay attention to them, and they feel the arrangement is "fair," if not equal. | | 9/24/2007 12:10:16 AM |
| | Divorced Dad in South Dakota takes MASSIVE ACTION | | NORTH DAKOTA: Secretary of state OKs child custody initiative by Divorced Dad - He has until August to get nearly 13,000 signatures to get it on the ballot for a state-wide vote. | | 9/24/2007 12:10:16 AM |
| | | | Another Adult Child of Divorce Speaks Out - Adults Suck | Great piece here: "As a child of divorce between two parents with few differences other than conflicting outlooks - the kid left in me wants to scream stop it any way you can even if it means you have to drop to your knees and plead." Most adults just don't get it - Unless you've gone through it as a child, you cannot possibly know anything about what us "children of divorce" go through. My comment - "Adults Suck" especially when they forget their childhood, humanity, responsibilities and selfishly place their needs above their obligations to their children. You would think Judges, the most educated members of society would get that. But they don't. and we've seen plenty of cases just like this: A father who has had his kids for many, many years finally gets an order of child support. He's forced to keep going to Family Court, spend money, and not get any support for the kids, for excuses that would never be tolerated if the roles were reversed. What woman waits years for such an order? Oh and he doesn't get an order of enforcement of child support by the Family Responsibility Office. The Judge turned down what is a routine order in every child support matter in Ontario - enforcement. This particular mother and the way the Court has let her off the hook for years epitomizes everything bigoted about Family Court. He told the Judge that his kids were begging him to stop all action in Family Court (mom was putting a lot of pressure on them, as you can all imagine.) Why is it that mothers rarely pay child support when they lose custody? Because - Adults Suck. | | 9/24/2007 12:10:16 AM |
| | |
|
|